U.S. Strikes Against Houthis Vital for Restoring Global Trade Freedom, Says Wall Street Journal
The Ongoing Debate Over U.S. Military Action in Yemen and its Implications for International Trade
March 17, 2025 – The recent U.S. airstrikes against Houthi forces in Yemen have sparked intense debate, with notable opinions emerging in leading global publications. One of the most prominent takes comes from The Wall Street Journal, which published an editorial titled “Trump Takes On the Houthis,” emphasizing the significance of these strikes in the broader context of global trade and regional stability.
U.S. Strikes and the Houthi Threat
The Wall Street Journal criticizes the previous Biden administration for allowing Iranian-backed Houthi rebels to disrupt vital maritime routes and attack U.S. military assets with impunity. The publication lauds former President Donald Trump for his decisive response to the threat posed by the Houthis, noting that the U.S. airstrikes were a strategic move aimed at restoring deterrence in the region. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Houthis’ repeated attacks on U.S. and commercial ships have escalated tensions, forcing the U.S. Navy into unprecedented combat operations, a situation not seen since World War II.
The editorial stresses that these airstrikes are not only a military necessity but also a means of securing global trade routes. The Wall Street Journal points out that Houthi attacks have severely impacted the Red Sea shipping lanes, crucial for global commerce, especially the link between Europe and Asia. As a result, shipping and insurance costs have surged, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of Houthi aggression.
The Broader Implications for Global Trade
The Telegraph, another influential British publication, echoes similar concerns in its editorial titled “Trade Routes Should Not Be the Responsibility of Britain and America Alone.” It highlights the strategic importance of the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab Strait, which connect critical oil and gas shipments from the Gulf to global markets. Despite the significant flow of goods through this route, securing these trade lanes has largely fallen to the U.S. and the U.K., with little support from other global powers.
The Telegraph further discusses the role of both the U.S. and the U.K. in countering Houthi attacks, particularly the U.K.’s involvement in previous airstrikes alongside the U.S. It argues that such threats to shipping must be dealt with through international cooperation and military intervention, particularly since the Houthis’ actions affect global shipping and the economies of several nations.
SUBSCRIBE
NO SPAM – JUST NEWS THAT MATTERS.
A Stark Contrast in Leadership
While The Wall Street Journal applauds Trump’s military response, the Telegraph suggests that the U.K. should shoulder more responsibility in protecting global trade routes. The British publication acknowledges that, while the U.S. and U.K. are leading efforts to safeguard maritime traffic, the response to Houthi aggression has often been insufficient in dealing with the scale of the threat.
Critical Voices and Opposition
On the other hand, Al-Akhbar, a Lebanese newspaper, takes a different stance on the U.S. military actions in Yemen. In an article titled “The American Aggression on Yemen and Its Imminent Failure,” writer Munir Shafiq argues that Trump’s decision to launch military strikes in Yemen will ultimately fail. Shafiq suggests that Yemen, historically resilient in defending its sovereignty, is unlikely to be overwhelmed by such interventions. Furthermore, he criticizes the broader geopolitical strategy that has led to the U.S. taking a combative stance against Yemen, warning of the risks of a larger regional conflict.
Shafiq asserts that while Trump’s military aggression may be doomed to fail, Yemen must remain unified in resisting foreign intervention, with Arab and Islamic countries, as well as global advocates of peace, raising their voices against such actions.
Conclusion: A Complex Conflict with Far-Reaching Consequences
The debate surrounding the U.S. strikes against the Houthis underscores the complexity of the Yemen conflict and its broader implications for global stability. While some argue that military intervention is necessary to protect vital trade routes and assert international law, others see the U.S. actions as part of a larger geopolitical strategy that risks escalating the conflict.
As the situation unfolds, it is clear that the struggle in Yemen is not only a regional issue but one with global economic and political repercussions, impacting everything from oil trade to international diplomacy. The coming weeks will likely see more developments as the U.S. and its allies weigh their next steps in a highly volatile region.
- Source: Wall Street Journal, BBC
